Banned for speaking the truth
Along with many other Twitter users, I find myself locked out of my account for daring to post an article which stated that those jabbed had the potential to shed and infect others. This appears on the Pfizer protocol document page 69 but clearly Twitter have not read this nor have they had the grace to apologise for their mistake. They just locked my account for spreading misinformation even though it is not misinformation.
I received notification that I had been locked out of my account so I appealed. I was informed that if I did not want to go ahead with the appeal, I would be able to get onto my account again. This seems like blackmail to me. Surely any sensible organisation would ask on what grounds/evidence I had for believing the article I had posted was true. I could have cleared that up within seconds but no, Twitter work on the erroneous assumption that all people must be guilty and prove their innocence. Seems like a cop out to me, actually.
I am a fairly helpful person so I copied the section of the Pfizer protocol that was relevant and sent it along with my appeal. I suggested that if they did not agree with Pfizer that they should take it up with them., not me.
Silence!
Twitter apparently have a long list of appeals and it may take some time to work through them. It does not surprise me that they have a long list of appeals if they are not prepared to do their own research before locking people out of their accounts for spreading the truth.
Such is life.
The benefits of being locked out are manifold. An awareness of my website has been one such bonus. I have pledged to update it more regularly now.
Of course, I will keep you updated. I will be interested to see what Pfizer has to say when Twitter contact them to verify the truth of their documents and why I should never have been locked out of my account at all. I am assuming that Twitter is going to contact Pfizer for confirmation otherwise how impartial are Twitter?
Watch this space.
Along with many other Twitter users, I find myself locked out of my account for daring to post an article which stated that those jabbed had the potential to shed and infect others. This appears on the Pfizer protocol document page 69 but clearly Twitter have not read this nor have they had the grace to apologise for their mistake. They just locked my account for spreading misinformation even though it is not misinformation.
I received notification that I had been locked out of my account so I appealed. I was informed that if I did not want to go ahead with the appeal, I would be able to get onto my account again. This seems like blackmail to me. Surely any sensible organisation would ask on what grounds/evidence I had for believing the article I had posted was true. I could have cleared that up within seconds but no, Twitter work on the erroneous assumption that all people must be guilty and prove their innocence. Seems like a cop out to me, actually.
I am a fairly helpful person so I copied the section of the Pfizer protocol that was relevant and sent it along with my appeal. I suggested that if they did not agree with Pfizer that they should take it up with them., not me.
Silence!
Twitter apparently have a long list of appeals and it may take some time to work through them. It does not surprise me that they have a long list of appeals if they are not prepared to do their own research before locking people out of their accounts for spreading the truth.
Such is life.
The benefits of being locked out are manifold. An awareness of my website has been one such bonus. I have pledged to update it more regularly now.
Of course, I will keep you updated. I will be interested to see what Pfizer has to say when Twitter contact them to verify the truth of their documents and why I should never have been locked out of my account at all. I am assuming that Twitter is going to contact Pfizer for confirmation otherwise how impartial are Twitter?
Watch this space.